If you follow the thread back you can see exactly what I was initially responding to and that my claim was relevant and that someone was indeed arguing against that, someone.

Yes you did say that I don't have sources or metrics. However unlike you I didn't call your question unfair or hypocritical. It's always a fair question and one that anyone can ask out of curiosity so they can learn more if there are indeed sources that the commenter previously learned from and can easily share. In fact I demonstrated how one can respond to such a question with honesty and without getting defensive and making accusations of arguing in bad faith, like you did.

You should review HN guidelines. Twice now you've responded in a way that is not welcome here.

In particular: Be kind.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Based on the kind words of another commenter I can now better see how gifted children could be better served. I don't think gifted children are being left behind but they possibly could learn more in an improved system. However that shouldn't be done with the false motivation that was initially claimed: that they are more important to society.

Equally important is more accurate and enough.