Re:The Right to Lie and Google’s “Web Environment Integrity”
by Gigachad on Sunday July 30, 2023 @08:52PM
(#36937719)
You don't even need to know what safety net is, the description after completely summarizes it and makes way more sense than talking about cash which I can't see any relation to the original topic.
I'm not sure how a non technical user is meant to get any kind of understanding of WEI from that metaphor. It can be explained quite simply "Websites can check if your browser has extensions or if your OS has been modified, and refuse access based on this information"
Re:The Right to Lie and Google’s “Web Environment Integrity”
by Brian_K_White on Monday July 31, 2023 @06:59AM
(#36940903)
But that "explaination" doesn't really mean much to most people. It says words but does not say why they are bad.
Re:The Right to Lie and Google’s “Web Environment Integrity”
by Gigachad on Monday July 31, 2023 @07:12PM
(#36950156)
It tells you exactly what is going on. It's up to people to decide for themselves if that's bad or not. I can't see any way to understand WEI going by the metaphore of buying newspapers. How does that explain anything?
Re:The Right to Lie and Google’s “Web Environment Integrity”
by Brian_K_White on Tuesday August 01, 2023 @09:26AM
(#36955651)
It tells me what's going on, which is useless because I already knew whats going on. It does not tell anyone who actually needs to be told whats going on.
Pretty much all non-technical users -- and a great many technical users -- have never heard of SafetyNet and don't know what it does.
Metaphors are imperfect; that's inherent to their very nature. That doesn't make them useless.