Korea Superconductor Papers Published ‘Without Consent’

Re:Korea Superconductor Papers Published ‘Without Consent’ –... by brucethemoose2 on Saturday July 29, 2023 @11:40PM (#36927595)

I am going to repost whywhy's link. Not sure why it was zapped, as I have seen this screenshot elsewhere:

https://elsazhou.medium.com/lk99-chinese-replication-efforts...

> However, the Meissner effect, a key characteristic of superconductors, has yet to be observed. The issue seems to lie in the purity of the superconducting material, which is currently only a few percent. Despite this, the conversation implies optimism, stating, “if we have made a start this problem will be solved quickly.”

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Korea Superconductor Papers Published ‘Without Consent’ –... by sillysaurusx on Sunday July 30, 2023 @12:55AM (#36927945)

In situations like that, you can click the timestamp of the dead comment and then click “vouch”. The comment will usually show up for everyone. (I just did it for whywhy.)

Comments from new accounts are sometimes autokilled for a variety of reasons, e.g. if the comment is posted from a Tor exit node.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Korea Superconductor Papers Published ‘Without Consent’ –... by brucethemoose2 on Sunday July 30, 2023 @01:06AM (#36928009)

I didn't know this, thanks.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Korea Superconductor Papers Published ‘Without Consent’ –... by sillysaurusx on Sunday July 30, 2023 @02:56AM (#36928585)

Also, use it wisely; it’s one of HN’s most interesting privileges.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Korea Superconductor Papers Published ‘Without Consent’ –... by brucethemoose2 on Sunday July 30, 2023 @03:56AM (#36928890)

I kinda like that its "hidden" for comments, and IMO the vouching system seems to work well.

[ Parent | on HN ]