News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Caging of America by twoodfin on Sunday March 11, 2012 @09:25PM (#3691945)
By “supply side criminology,” he means the conservative theory of crime that claimed that social circumstances produced a certain net amount of crime waiting to be expressed; if you stopped it here, it broke out there. The only way to stop crime was to lock up all the potential criminals.

Very odd to describe this as a "conservative" idea. Most conservatives I know object to this sort of sociological determinism, instead embracing the idea of individual responsibility. If anything, they believe in the power of (slowly) malleable culture and institutions to shape outcomes, rather than accepting bad outcomes as inevitable.

Re:The Caging of America by wmeredith on Sunday March 11, 2012 @11:07PM (#3692180)
Unfortunately for most nowadays a conservative and a dogmatic neo-con are the same thing. Only two parties, remember?
Re:The Caging of America by pyre on Monday March 12, 2012 @12:07AM (#3692296)
The 'con' in neo-con stands for 'conservative' (unless I'm horribly misinformed). I'd say that it's less of a matter of 'there can be only two parties,' then it is of them being associated with each other by trying to use such a generic term to describe themselves.
Re:The Caging of America by steve19 on Monday March 12, 2012 @12:06AM (#3692293)
Not the same. Look at Tea Party vs. Neo-Cons, same party, very different agenda.