Re:U.S. Marine Corps Antenna Handbook (1999) [pdf]
by gabia on Saturday July 29, 2023 @06:12AM
(#36918654)
Aether refers to some historical ideas (which evolved over time), and though the word isn’t in use anymore the current model of fields has similarities (ofc in many ways very different). Have just been reading some of the history of this (Einstein plays a big role), it’s very interesting, thank you! :) You might be interested in this discussion https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27942970
Re:U.S. Marine Corps Antenna Handbook (1999) [pdf]
by rusk on Saturday July 29, 2023 @06:31AM
(#36918766)
Way over my head unfortunately
Re:U.S. Marine Corps Antenna Handbook (1999) [pdf]
by zmgsabst on Saturday July 29, 2023 @08:00AM
(#36919385)
Wilczek points out that field theories are aether theories — as is relativity.
“Aether just means this one particular historical model!” is branding more than reality; and hides the fact that modern theories also describe an everywhere substrate of which particles are localized excitations and gravity is localized warping.
Re:U.S. Marine Corps Antenna Handbook (1999) [pdf]
by runlaszlorun on Saturday July 29, 2023 @08:18AM
(#36919530)
Air is aether.
Hmm sounds dangerously close to aether theory. I thought we had moved past this … that EM waves exist in their own right without need for a medium. Unlike sound say.