You offer a bit of insight about using something as a content repository. That's an interesting take.
I appreciate the question and the thought process it invites. I'm also glad you added your insight in response.
Yeah you couldn't do it by whatsapp, but you could do it with discord, slack, teams, skype and a bunch of other services.
That you get so defensive is really, and I mean REALLY, telling of the real reason.
The most absurd part of this argument is that discord, WhatsApp, messenger, etc… are all also social media platforms. This is by far the silliest “well actually” I’ve ever seen on HN.
But that’s really besides the point, because as you said, they’re all social media platforms, and it’s social media when somebody posts content on them to their large public audience, and it’s social media when I post to my small audience of friends. It’s the suggestion that one of those scenarios is social media and the other isn’t that’s completely illogical.
I actually 100% agree with you here, but assuredly not in the way you meant it.
What it's NOT is that you couldn't replicate a simple media sharing experience between a tight nit group of friends. That's demonstrably false.
> This is by far the silliest “well actually” I’ve ever seen on HN.
No, it's... something else. Again, you're being extremely defensive when someone points out simple facts. Iykyk.
It’s the media bit… Insta is created to share pictures and videos with your _own_ selection of followers. You couldn’t do that in WhatsApp without creating some horrific cartesian product of different groups chats for every node on your social graph. Even then the UX is designed around messaging, not as a content repository.
This has to be one of the most asinine takes I’ve ever seen.