Re:Why No Roman Industrial Revolution?
by smegger001 on Friday July 28, 2023 @07:00PM
(#36914537)
sort of. they had Aeolipile which is a primitive steam engine but it was looked at as more a curiosity than as a practical tool.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why No Roman Industrial Revolution?
by seiferteric on Friday July 28, 2023 @07:11PM
(#36914640)
I was thinking about this, what really started the industrial revolution? I think the aeolipile, like other contraptions was just seen as a toy. Could it be that the Newcomen engine proved that real value and work could be done using machines in this way? Maybe just knowing that it was possible after being demonstrated by the Newcomen engine really kicked it off rather than some nebulous societal conditions.
Newcomen solved a real problem and created a virtuous loop: it helped pump water from coal mines, which made coal cheaper to extract, which helped keep the (quite inefficient) machine running long enough that it could be refined to the point that it could be used elsewhere.