Re:California moves to silence Stanford researchers who got ...
by viscanti on Friday July 28, 2023 @01:36PM
(#36910349)
They need to be able to have 5 months where they can clear the calendars and just work on that. It's still a lot for 5 months, but I imagine there's a lot of downtime too. Are they getting 5+ months every year?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:California moves to silence Stanford researchers who got ...
by mrguyorama on Friday July 28, 2023 @02:17PM
(#36910971)
>hey need to be able to have 5 months where they can clear the calendars and just work on that
Otherwise known as "having a job"
Re:California moves to silence Stanford researchers who got ...
by viscanti on Friday July 28, 2023 @04:19PM
(#36912716)
Yeah. Having a job seems like it could keep you from regularly being able to stop everything for 5 months of high paid work. Maybe the money is enough from the few months that they're fine with it (and maybe it's easy for them to get a new job after or go back somewhere they've worked before). I'm genuinely curious. It seems like a lot to make for 5 months, but what do their earnings look like over a 5 or 10 year period?
Re:California moves to silence Stanford researchers who got ...
by nonethewiser on Friday July 28, 2023 @03:09PM
(#36911735)
I suppose its actually spread out over a long period of time