Re:Tor’s shadowy reputation will only end if we all use it
by tasbir49 on Friday July 28, 2023 @01:11PM
(#36910012)
I agree. The certainty is reassuring. I also would never want my computer to touch even the most remotely objectionable material. I've contemplated running a Lemmy instance before, but the concerns you've brought forth are the main contributing factors in my decision to not do so.
Not only that, but TOR is something that becomes more private the more someone uses it. Iirc it's really easy to distinguish TOR packets from regular packets. Combine that with how few people use TOR, you're job of narrowing down who's abusing it becomes much easier.
Finally, just running an exit node opens one up to many legal liabilities. It's not something that's worth the effort, but it's strength comes from many people running one.
Re:Tor’s shadowy reputation will only end if we all use it
by swapfile on Friday July 28, 2023 @01:52PM
(#36910598)
>Personally for me it is about the traffic that may be routed through my computer by the Tor network
No traffic is routed through your computer by using Tor, running a relay is a completely separate thing that can't be done by accident.
Personally for me it is about the traffic that may be routed through my computer by the Tor network - I definitely do not want child porn, drugs or terrorist related site transactions packets to even touch my computer. It maybe a rare occurrence, but I want certainty. If we could control the traffic that is allowed on our network / computer, I'd be a more willing user of Tor. (A use case example would be to allow a Tor user to create a white list of onion sites from which they would be willing to accept traffic).