When a resumes is from her link, there are high chances it's a real person who took the time to read the job description.
Sadly, this is not new:
https://medium.com/@jannaq/the-robot-takeover-is-already-her...
I don't see how this can be a problem. People do look for jobs by contacting companies. Isn't the goal of a recruiter to check potential candidates?
> Bots and other 3rd party recruiters are also trying to game the system so they drown real candidates.
I fail to see how this problem is avoided by ignoring the company's inbox.
> When a resumes is from her link, there are high chances it's a real person who took the time to read the job description.
I don't but it. This does not pass the smell test, as screening does not depend on which input you use.
It sounds like someone is failing to meet their job requirements.
Your comment makes no sense. You're arguing that a recruiter should miss 100% of all contacts because otherwise they would miss things.
It's like arguing to throw the baby out with the bath water because otherwise your recruiter would miss things like the soap.
Curious, how does one ignore something that is never actually sent to them, explicitly or not?
It sounds like your recruiter is purposely ignoring any resume that is not explicitly sent to her personally. It sounds like a job security move at the expense of both the company and candidate's best interests.