Re:A Modern High-Performance Open Source Message Queuing System
by ecshafer on Thursday July 27, 2023 @07:16PM
(#36901342)
I think I just got it wrong. Not invented here sounds better and more right. I just typically think of only the acronym, and decided to write it out in case someone hadn’t heard it (and thus made a mistake). Good catch.
Re:A Modern High-Performance Open Source Message Queuing System
by marginalia_nu on Thursday July 27, 2023 @07:46PM
(#36901589)
There's a bunch of alternative meanings that have cropped up to suit the new and wider meaning (which is definitely common).
Seen Not Implemented Here too.
In the original sense, the NIH approach would be to invent a rivalling technique to the message broker. That is indeed a questionable idea.