News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:TSA Out of Our Pants -- FAQ by djb_hackernews on Sunday March 11, 2012 @12:51AM (#3689684)
Install a background? Photoshop? You do realize that the backscatter machines aren't taking a picture right? There isn't a "background" to change. It's basically an X-ray machine, throw some radiation, see what bounces back.

I'll let you figure out why building a backing that is made up of different materials that reflect radiation in a checkerboard pattern won't work.

Re:TSA Out of Our Pants -- FAQ by snprbob86 on Sunday March 11, 2012 @04:08AM (#3689921)
The phrases "You do realize that" and "I'll let you figure out why" are condescending. The tone of your post is rude. Moreover, you're clearly the one who doesn't understand: The prior poster was proposing a checker pattern of reflective material on the background.
Re:TSA Out of Our Pants -- FAQ by georgieporgie on Sunday March 11, 2012 @03:41AM (#3689871)
I'll let you figure out why building a backing that is made up of different materials that reflect radiation in a checkerboard pattern won't work.

Uh. Why won't it work? From what I recall of the images, they're sort of gray-scale. The brightness of a body drops off as it falls away from the camera (i.e. the outline of your body is a darker gray than, say, your forward-facing bellybutton region), since, presumably, as we wrap around to the sides of your body, more energy is bounced out to the sides than to the 'camera'.

So, I assume it's depicting the amount of radiation reflected back to the 'camera', right? So, if you make a checkerboard background of materials that bounce differing amounts of energy back (either due to composition of the tile or its angle), why wouldn't it work?