Though the author might have had an old-fogey tone he does bring some interesting points to light:
1. why do young people in auto-centric cities hold off on getting a car? 2. why are young people not migrating to places where the jobs are? 3. there seem to be a correlation between recession-era kids and entrepreneurism.
I think these are very real issues that merit discussion.
2. Maybe they don't see a need to migrate to places where physical presence is necessary to undertake these jobs when location independent work is a rising tide? (Thus further negating the entire point of having a car and / or submitting to the prior mentioned procedures from point 1?)
Speaking for myself those are the reasons I don't submit to the whole car culture thing and the reason I don't choose a location to live based on employment / economic factors, but then I'm 32, so I acknowledge I'm not generation Y. It stands to reason though that there are some people in that generation proceeding on the same basis as I am.
Boomers criticising any generation for not wanting to play the game strikes me as utterly hilarious. Especially from a guy with a book titled "Why you need and love the rat race". It's self parody at its finest.
Perhaps this is also why working at Foxconn - migrating to a different city just to work long hours and live in dorms, seem so alien and cruel to Americans.
If we're renaming generations, perhaps we can rename his the "You've Lead America Off a Cliff And Stiffed Your Children With The Bill." Generation.
Not catchy enough? Here are a few more to try on:
The "You Voted For SOPA" Generation
The "Civil Liberties? Overrated." Generation
The "Hey, I Don't Have To Go Fight That War" Generation
The "I Can't Email, But I Can Reform Washington" Generation