Re:Breaking Superconductor News
by perihelions on Wednesday July 26, 2023 @05:39PM
(#36885446)
- "I don’t know what EPR is so can’t comment, but given I have not seen this before it’s not really a standard technique to identify/characterise superconductivity."
That's a surprising type of dismissive. The authors themselves think [electron paramagnetic resonance] was key experimental validation of their (non-standard) superconductivity model. Wouldn't you be at least a little curious?
That's a surprising type of dismissive. The authors themselves think [electron paramagnetic resonance] was key experimental validation of their (non-standard) superconductivity model. Wouldn't you be at least a little curious?