Re:Breaking Superconductor News
by thepasswordis on Wednesday July 26, 2023 @04:24PM
(#36884426)
It's probably better to link to the original, not this mirror: https://twitter.com/condensed_the/status/1684255515944034304
Re:Breaking Superconductor News
by MikeBVaughn on Wednesday July 26, 2023 @04:46PM
(#36884739)
The replies don't load for me in this one.
Nitter is an alternative front-end that allow you to view the tweet and the response while Twitter only only to view the attached tweet only. So in fact , it's better that he used nitter rather than the "original"
Re:Breaking Superconductor News
by cmrdporcupine on Thursday July 27, 2023 @08:30AM
(#36892446)
Twitter is not a publicly available resource, not part of the open web: Its URLs are semi-private and require an account to fully read and they should not be posted here on HN.
For almost two weeks they were fully locked, and now one can only see the original post and not the thread, and all browsing is locked out.
Also, on the sentences in the manuscripts trying to explain the effect: I think that is wild guess at best. The measurement results done in the manuscripts probably can be taken at at face value (at least until there is a reproduction). Whether they really indicate superconductivity or something else that looks like it in some of the aspects is then a different question.