Re:Boeing has now lost $1.1B on Starliner, with no crew flig...
by ktpecot on Wednesday July 26, 2023 @02:24PM
(#36882492)
Given that starliner is still not operational and the situation in Russia the description seems pretty on point to me?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Boeing has now lost $1.1B on Starliner, with no crew flig...
by FireBeyond on Wednesday July 26, 2023 @02:36PM
(#36882701)
So does, "Announced in 2012 to be launched in November 2016, the program suffered numerous delays until four years after the initial launch date, it's taking off..."
> and the situation in Russia
Presumably you mean the Ukraine invasion, which had zero bearing on this, given that it happened nearly a year and a half later...
Re:Boeing has now lost $1.1B on Starliner, with no crew flig...
by ktpecot on Wednesday July 26, 2023 @02:54PM
(#36882994)
I mean I guess you are correct it was late but it was still first relative to Boeing. So the timeline warranted less emphasis then say now when Boeing is delayed 3 plus years on top of that.
I’m not sure how you can say the Ukraine invasion has zero bearing on the “NASA…having no access to space”. Given starliner is a dumpster fire and NASA would not be able to reliably count on Soyuz for access to ISS, it was a remarkably prescient statement. Even if Russia hadn’t invaded in 2020 it was obvious that NASA having its own capability to get to ISS was a strategic priority, that was only achieved by SpaceX.
Re:Boeing has now lost $1.1B on Starliner, with no crew flig...
by selimthegrim on Wednesday July 26, 2023 @03:09PM
(#36883236)
In 2022?