Re:Boeing has now lost $1.1B on Starliner, with no crew flig...
by Symmetry on Wednesday July 26, 2023 @02:13PM
(#36882294)
Atlas V is also a ULA rather than a Boeing rocket. I'd be much more eager to trust my life to a ULA space vehicle than a Boeing one.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Boeing has now lost $1.1B on Starliner, with no crew flig...
by FireBeyond on Wednesday July 26, 2023 @02:26PM
(#36882525)
> trust my life to a ULA space vehicle than a Boeing one
So it gets 50% of your trust, then?
> The company, which is a joint venture between Lockheed Martin Space and Boeing Defense, Space & Security, was formed in December 2006.
Re:Boeing has now lost $1.1B on Starliner, with no crew flig...
by Symmetry on Wednesday July 26, 2023 @04:52PM
(#36884840)
Oh, I know. And I continue to be amazed at how much healthier of an engineering culture ULA has than Boeing for just that reason. It would be one thing if it split off before the "out-sourced profits" era at Boeing. I'm not familiar with how the amalgamation happened, though.
Re:Boeing has now lost $1.1B on Starliner, with no crew flig...
by tekla on Wednesday July 26, 2023 @02:19PM
(#36882401)
ULA is half Boeing
Re:Boeing has now lost $1.1B on Starliner, with no crew flig...
by panick21_ on Wednesday July 26, 2023 @03:12PM
(#36883287)
Yeah but Boeing brought the Delta into the marriage and LM brought Atlas. Pretty clear who brought to good stuff.
Re:Boeing has now lost $1.1B on Starliner, with no crew flig...
by mcpackieh on Thursday July 27, 2023 @01:08AM
(#36889164)
Delta IV and Delta IV Heavy have had a pretty good track record. Only one more will fly though, and ULA's replacement (Vulcan) is still vaporware (thanks in large part to Jeff Bezos' Blue Origin having numerous delays in producing the engines for Vulcan... )