News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The First Room-Temperature Ambient-Pressure Superconductor by legulere on Wednesday July 26, 2023 @01:06AM (#36873342)
Nuclear power and coal power are both heat engines turning heat into mechanical energy and subsequently electricity. They merely use a different heat source.

They share a lot of qualities because of that. They are relatively centralized and best run in a base-load rather than a load-following mode to reduce mechanical stress and increase longevity.

Re:The First Room-Temperature Ambient-Pressure Superconductor by midoridensha on Wednesday July 26, 2023 @04:52AM (#36874793)
>Nuclear power and coal power are both heat engines turning heat into mechanical energy and subsequently electricity. They merely use a different heat source.

Not completely true. There are some experimental nuclear reactors that convert nuclear energy directly to electricity without the heat cycle, such as [Helion](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helion_Energy).

Re:The First Room-Temperature Ambient-Pressure Superconductor by jacquesm on Wednesday July 26, 2023 @06:40AM (#36875469)
When presenting working experimental nuclear reactors Helion is not the company that I would use as my example. They are borderline scammy and given their lack of progress they seem to be stuck in the moving the goalposts phase for a long long time now. I wouldn't bet on them ever completing a working reactor that produces net power.
Re:The First Room-Temperature Ambient-Pressure Superconductor by midoridensha on Thursday July 27, 2023 @12:17AM (#36888843)
Maybe, but my point is that it does seem to be possible to generate electricity directly from nuclear reactions, without going through a thermal cycle (making heat, creating steam, using that to turn a turbine). I think there's some other experimental process that promises to do this with fission.