Re:The First Room-Temperature Ambient-Pressure Superconductor
by arjvik on Tuesday July 25, 2023 @08:50PM
(#36871764)
I think we're talking about the same thing, but I explained it absolutely terribly.
If we "dump the other output" back into the power source, such as the battery, does that solve the problem of not implicitly dumping it into the environment? Or is it still destroying information?
Re:The First Room-Temperature Ambient-Pressure Superconductor
by nick__m on Tuesday July 25, 2023 @09:35PM
(#36872099)
I think that you could move those bits to destroy them somewhere else but what I got from pezezin post is that there are many order of improvement to achieve before that loss becomes significant enough to warrant the incredible complexity of shipping wasted bits to the heat sink.
Re:The First Room-Temperature Ambient-Pressure Superconductor
by jtbayly on Wednesday July 26, 2023 @09:35AM
(#36877450)
How will you choose which output is the one with the AND result? You'd need some logic to pick which output was the right one, I assume. Then you've got the same problem again.
Re:The First Room-Temperature Ambient-Pressure Superconductor
by codethief on Wednesday July 26, 2023 @07:12AM
(#36875750)
This is the first time I'm hearing it phrased this way and I wonder why it hadn't occurred to me before. Thanks so much, in any case, you have just increased my understanding quite a bit. :) slapshead
Not quite, it's a thermodynamic principle that applies to any way you could possibly compute AND. Basically, the laws of physics are reversible, so your computation must be reversible too. There are 4 possible inputs to an AND gate, so to be reversible there must be 4 possible outputs, one for each input. But we only want one output for the rest of our computation, so the other one dump into the environment somehow.