News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The IBM mainframe: How it runs and why it survives by gumby on Monday July 24, 2023 @02:26PM (#36852295)
> Going back to the hardware that everyone likes to focus on, it's less radically different from normal servers today than it was historically. The mainframe today is a 19 inch rack like any other.

The Main Frame of yore was ... one of the 19 inch racks the computer was made out of (the main one, typically with the ALU and registers in it). And those racks were used because that was how phone systems were built (phone systems had a lot more repeated / regular structure than something like a computer, though of course everything has converged). The "frame" nomenclature came from the phone system too.

So "normal servers today" got the rack from the mainframe, the mainframe didn't adopt it because of how datacenters were built. All the familiar stuff (raised floors, chillers, backup power, fire suppression, controlled access doors and so on) come from the mainframe world.

Re:The IBM mainframe: How it runs and why it survives by electroly on Monday July 24, 2023 @06:01PM (#36854864)
The granddaddy of mainframes, System/360, was never in 19" racks. IBM first introduced the use of 19" racks in their midrange lines. What we currently call IBM z didn't adopt standard racks until the 21st century.
Re:The IBM mainframe: How it runs and why it survives by rbanffy on Tuesday July 25, 2023 @06:25AM (#36860309)
I find 19" racks a bit too thin and tall. Definitely their 24" ones were the right proportions.