News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:IE9 pwn2owned with 0-day with exploit working back from I... by ecaron on Friday March 09, 2012 @12:05PM (#3684868)
As having personally worked to tell the IE team about a severe bug (crashie.com), I can tell you that their process, community and bureaucracy are by far the worst part of Internet Explorer. You'll get ignored, told that the problem is with your code, mocked in the forums, and then ultimately told the problem isn't a big enough deal (or in my case, too complicated) to fix.

The only way to get the IE team to fix issues is make a public spectacle like Vupen did. And I completely get only exposing bugs when there is a profit to be made, because any other route is counterproductive.

Re:IE9 pwn2owned with 0-day with exploit working back from I... by yuhong on Friday March 09, 2012 @02:08PM (#3685474)
There is a difference between security and non-security bugs. Null pointer dereferences and hangs are not security bugs. Security bugs you are supposed to report to MSRC. Non-security bugs typically has to wait until next version of IE to fix.
Re:IE9 pwn2owned with 0-day with exploit working back from I... by lukesandberg on Friday March 09, 2012 @04:58PM (#3686154)
That is assuming that it is easy to tell the difference between security and non-security bugs. Null pointer dereferences can and have been exploited to escape security sandboxes. I read about an interesting one a few years in flash. unfortunately all i can find now are secondary sources (http://www.zdnet.com/blog/security/mark-dowds-null-pointer-d...).