Re:Young people are flocking to astrology
by ndsipa_pomu on Monday July 24, 2023 @08:22AM
(#36846784)
I'm not clear on the meaning of 2 and how would it apply to something such as atomic decay? Who would be the "another" that causes an atom to decay?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Young people are flocking to astrology
by throw0101a on Monday July 24, 2023 @10:12AM
(#36848313)
See perhaps "Causality and radioactive decay":
* https://edwardfeser.blogspot.com/2014/12/causality-and-radio...
Re:Young people are flocking to astrology
by ndsipa_pomu on Monday July 24, 2023 @10:18AM
(#36848408)
Is it my imagination, or does Fesser always leap into an accusation of the poor reading skills of people who disagree with him?
Anyhow, I can't really find a decent answer in that blog - my understanding is that he hand-waves it away by declaring that it is beyond physics and thus can't be confirmed or denied by such. Not a satisfying answer to my mind and I consider that tower of logic to be on shaky ground.
Re:Young people are flocking to astrology
by throw0101a on Monday July 24, 2023 @10:26AM
(#36848520)
> Is it my imagination, or does Fesser always leap into an accusation of the poor reading skills of people who disagree with him?
He's been publicly writing (online) since 2008:
* https://edwardfeser.blogspot.com/2008/
At some point attacks on straw men gets tiring I guess.
> Anyhow, I can't really find a decent answer in that blog - my understanding is that he hand-waves it away by declaring that it is beyond physics and thus can't be confirmed or denied by such.
Which is right, in a sense. The fallacy is to use that as a proof of his proposition even though it’s a non sequitur.