> Well, I also do similar kind of judgement. I.e. if someone is seriously religious, flat earth believing or ghost worshiping etc, then I would just assume they... have many things to left learn.
Yeah that's all dandy until they refuse to learn things because it's against doctrine, start restricting your bodily autonomy and freedoms and ultimately make learning things that disprove their illusions punishable.
Reframing mundane life as sexual social fantasies is about on par with astrology imo
> So, the real question is, if a really cute girl that you like smiling in front of you, and she asks your "star type" (or "constellation"), what would you really do at that spot?
That's an oxymoron because stupidity is never cute. If she appeared cute before saying that, she certainly wouldn't after.
> That's an oxymoron because stupidity is never cute.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pceDfPLf2hw
Note: This is not an endorsement. It is just a pedantic refutation of your claim.
ok sheldon
I’d laugh and say ‘seriously’? And if she was really serious I’d say I don’t believe in any of that. My MIL is into this nonsense - she alone and broke and I think a great example of where crazy beliefs like this lead if you hold them long enough. It’s an enormous red flag for me.
But often as I encountered it, some individual is also too cute to be treated rudely. This is a bit of dilemma, really. Because if you share what you've learned, then no matter how respectful you tried to make it look, they might still switch to defense mode and spoil the feelings.
So, the real question is, if a really cute girl that you like smiling in front of you, and she asks your "star type" (or "constellation"), what would you really do at that spot?
(BTW, you probably don't want to answer G, because I guess it's not hot enough. I'll try A next time)