Re:Signal's president vows to reject UK law on message scann...
by immibis on Monday July 24, 2023 @02:43AM
(#36843862)
If you ask people "Should CSAM be caught?" they'll say "yes" because, duh.
If you ask people "Should phones scan their files for CSAM?" a good part will say "yes" because it doesn't sound like it affects anyone outside of child pornographers.
If you ask people "Should phones send your photos to GCHQ to check if they're CSAM?" most people will say "no".
If you ask people "Should phones send your photos to GCHQ to check if they're CSAM, and should we send Apple executives to prison if they don't make their phones do this?" most people will still say "no".
If you ask people "Should phones scan their files for CSAM?" a good part will say "yes" because it doesn't sound like it affects anyone outside of child pornographers.
If you ask people "Should phones send your photos to GCHQ to check if they're CSAM?" most people will say "no".
If you ask people "Should phones send your photos to GCHQ to check if they're CSAM, and should we send Apple executives to prison if they don't make their phones do this?" most people will still say "no".