Re:Teach your LLM to answer with facts, not fiction
by lqhl on Sunday July 23, 2023 @10:57PM
(#36842612)
As jwells89 mentioned, LLMs can extract the intention from questions and generate better queries for a search engine or database.
Re:Teach your LLM to answer with facts, not fiction
by akasakahakada on Sunday July 23, 2023 @11:49PM
(#36842926)
I don't need LLM to assume my intention, I need exact matches for keywords.
Re:Teach your LLM to answer with facts, not fiction
by ben_w on Monday July 24, 2023 @04:58AM
(#36844833)
Then you don't want an LLM at all; exact keyword matches are something we did in the mid 90s, one of the specific value-adds of an LLM is that it doesn't get stuck when you've only got a half-remembered inexact quote or vague description.
Re:Teach your LLM to answer with facts, not fiction
by reissbaker on Sunday July 23, 2023 @11:45PM
(#36842895)
LLM, confusingly, does stand for legal master of laws, despite the acronym not quite fitting. It's an advanced law degree some lawyers get. ChatGPT isn't gaslighting you! That's a true fact.
https://law.pepperdine.edu/blog/posts/llm-versus-jd-degree.h...
- The usual knowledge cutoff warning
- An explanation of what a hallucination is
If (in a separate conversation) I give GPT-3.5 the exact prompt that explains what an LLM is, I get gaslighted instead. GPT-3.5 attempts to tell me that LLM stands for "Legal Master of Laws". Then it gives the knowledge cutoff warning, and then the same correct explanation Myscale got.
The rest of this article appears to be trying to turn GPT into a frontend for search engines. I don't know why people keep trying to do this.