News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Man found guilty of child porn because he ran a Tor exit ... by ChainOfFools on Sunday July 23, 2023 @04:54PM (#36839732)
this is possibly because generated CSAM may look like no real human child nor resemble any human child in particular today. give it 5 years and physical distinction from real children and even a specific child is likely to happen. so a photo perfect likeness of your kid ends up in some disgusting video and the creators get off the hook because it's 'not real' by say a narrow color gradiation or kinematic similarity standard undetectable to human eyes? no thanks.
Re:Man found guilty of child porn because he ran a Tor exit ... by dotnet00 on Sunday July 23, 2023 @05:39PM (#36840134)
That isn't really much of an issue, some places count material intended to resemble a real child or derived from CSAM (etc a drawing referenced from real CSAM) as still being illegal. That would handily cover the situation you've mentioned.

In those cases, for fictional CSAM to be legal, it has to be completely fictional such that any resemblances can be shown to be completely coincidence.