News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Elixir for Ruby developers: the three most important differences. Parent comment

Re:Elixir for Ruby developers: the three most important diff... by enraged_camel on Sunday July 23, 2023 @04:12PM (#36839322)
My experience has been the total opposite. It can give simple answers but makes up total nonsense for anything non-trivial.

That said, with Ecto I just ask it to give me the SQL query. From there it’s pretty easy to manually write the Ecto equivalent.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Elixir for Ruby developers: the three most important diff... by arrowsmith on Sunday July 23, 2023 @04:39PM (#36839584)
Are you using GPT-4 (the paid version) or GPT 3.5?

3.5 is as you describe. 4 isn't perfect but it's good enough, in my experience.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Elixir for Ruby developers: the three most important diff... by manmal on Sunday July 23, 2023 @05:56PM (#36840273)
That was right after the release of GPT-4, when it was slow but good. Haven’t gotten around to much Elixir coding since, it could be that they crippled GPT-4 too much to be of use in the meantime.

Oh and the chat is better for me than the API. API sometimes gives me the complete opposite of what the chat (correctly) gives me.

[ Parent | on HN ]