News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:I thought I wanted to be a professor. Then, I served on a... by raister on Saturday July 22, 2023 @09:48AM (#36826200)
> One professor strongly advocated for his own postdoc, even though his CV was not at all competitive. After considerable debate—and without consensus—he was invited for an interview anyway.

This alone happens more frequent than not. Idea here is to land (PhD) on a remarkable lab with a supervisor on the committee...

Re:I thought I wanted to be a professor. Then, I served on a... by sangel on Saturday July 22, 2023 @10:25AM (#36826501)
This is strange to me. Many universities, including mine, avoid interviewing applicants with a PhD or postdoc from the same institution to which they are applying.
Re:I thought I wanted to be a professor. Then, I served on a... by numbers_guy on Saturday July 22, 2023 @10:37AM (#36826604)
Being forced to upend your life and relocate far away every four years is also not a positive aspect of academic life.
Re:I thought I wanted to be a professor. Then, I served on a... by briandear on Saturday July 22, 2023 @12:34PM (#36827606)
You should try working for the State Department or the military!
Re:I thought I wanted to be a professor. Then, I served on a... by ke88y on Saturday July 22, 2023 @01:13PM (#36827918)
Military officer corps at least comes with a insanely generous pay+benefits package when compared to PhD and post-doc. And the bar is lower and work easier for most positions.
Re:I thought I wanted to be a professor. Then, I served on a... by tgv on Saturday July 22, 2023 @02:01PM (#36828279)
You graduate, get an external, preferably foreign post-doc, and return to interview for the next available position. Problem solved.
Re:I thought I wanted to be a professor. Then, I served on a... by sangel on Saturday July 22, 2023 @03:19PM (#36828958)
At least in my department, this will not work as long as the applicant's supervisor or dissertation committee members are still in the department. The crux of the issue, in my mind, is that it is hard to have candid and unbiased discussion about a candidate when the supervisor / dissertation committee is part of that discussion.