A conclusion reached through faulty reasoning is nothing to be relied on, even if it's coincidentally correct.
It may not have been constructive, but it was deconstructive, and I think that's valuable too.
(did not downvote you, btw)
It may not have been constructive, but it was deconstructive, and I think that's valuable too.
(did not downvote you, btw)
I’m not sure your parent was actually incorrect. Even you agree that his point stands, so your post is not constructive.