Re:Insurance Company Drops Customer Saying a 'Drone' Took Ph...
by apple4ever on Saturday July 22, 2023 @12:47PM
(#36827707)
Sorry but have you looked at the pictures? There is zero risk to what he is doing. Its not just "me" its common sense that its not a risk. There is zero hazard here.
Re:Insurance Company Drops Customer Saying a 'Drone' Took Ph...
by justinclift on Saturday July 29, 2023 @08:51AM
(#36919790)
> There is zero risk to what he is doing.
Wonder if those tyres would change that risk factor, as tyres burn pretty well.
To you it may not seem significant but to a wildfire risk specialist, these are precisely the kinds of hazards were looking for.
The standards are high, but they are so for a reason. We're losing thousands of homes per season to wildfire.
Was it bad customer service to just drop him? Yes. Should he have the opportunity to mitigate? Absolutely.
But ignorance of your risk doesn't mean some one else is obligated to take the other side of that bet. I've said it a couple times else where. If insurance companies thought they could still be writing policies in California, they would. It's billions of dollars in annual premium they are passing on. They aren't doing so because, yes, storing tires against your house is significant enough of a risk factor to warrant non-renewal. Companies like State Farm would rather pull back entirely than accept the risk.