News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on LLaMA2 isn't “Open Source” – and why it doesn't matter. Parent comment

Re:LLaMA2 isn't “Open Source” – and why it doesn't matter by gtirloni on Friday July 21, 2023 @03:38PM (#36818550)
It just likes a little imoral vs illegal confusion.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:LLaMA2 isn't “Open Source” – and why it doesn't matter by remram on Friday July 21, 2023 @04:07PM (#36818970)
You think search engines are immoral? You think we should pay to view the snippets under the results we don't click?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:LLaMA2 isn't “Open Source” – and why it doesn't matter by ang_cire on Friday July 21, 2023 @08:29PM (#36821897)
I don't think we should pay, I think Google should. They're the ones making profit.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:LLaMA2 isn't “Open Source” – and why it doesn't matter by remram on Sunday July 23, 2023 @09:52PM (#36842143)
The result of that is either that they wouldn't show snippets or that they would pass the cost on to you. And do you think they profit from showing the snippets of results that are not the result you want to click on?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:LLaMA2 isn't “Open Source” – and why it doesn't matter by gtirloni on Monday July 24, 2023 @07:56AM (#36846439)
No, I'm saying even though some thing is legal, it could still be imoral. And vice-versa.
[ Parent | on HN ]