News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:LLaMA2 isn't “Open Source” – and why it doesn't matter by 6gvONxR4sf7o on Friday July 21, 2023 @02:47PM (#36817828)
One of the common elements of training sets for these models (including LLama) is the Books3 dataset, which is a huge number of pirated books from torrents. That's exactly what you described.

Regardless, the lack of a license cannot give you more permission than a restrictive license. You're arguing that if take a book out of a bookstore without paying (or signing a contract), then I have more rights than if I sign a contract and then leave with the book.

Re:LLaMA2 isn't “Open Source” – and why it doesn't matter by torstenvl on Sunday July 23, 2023 @08:23PM (#36841507)
> the lack of a license [agreement] cannot give you more permission than a restrictive license [agreement]

That is clearly false. It's hard to imagine the confusion of ideas that would lead you to such a conclusion.