News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:George Dyson's continued downplaying of British computing... by rst on Thursday March 08, 2012 @04:31PM (#3681755)
Looks like I may have blown it --- confusing this machine with the 603. I hate when that happens, but happy for the correction. (I'll try to delete the earlier comment, mischaracterizing the 601, just to try to head off the error at the pass...)
Re:George Dyson's continued downplaying of British computing... by abecedarius on Thursday March 08, 2012 @05:08PM (#3681913)
Ah, no problem.

I looked up the book on Atanasoff -- it's by Jane Smiley, and I should add that she clearly didn't understand computers (most egregiously, she seemed to think 'digital' meant 'electronic'). Still, not taking her judgments for granted, I thought there was some interesting history there I hadn't heard about, and Atanasoff really seemed to have gotten a lot right earlier than most, and Mauchly to have only subtracted value from what he'd learned from him. (Eckert on the other hand came off as a great engineer.) I have no independent knowledge of this stuff, however.