Re:George Dyson's continued downplaying of British computing...
by rst on Thursday March 08, 2012 @04:31PM
(#3681755)
Looks like I may have blown it --- confusing this machine with the 603. I hate when that happens, but happy for the correction. (I'll try to delete the earlier comment, mischaracterizing the 601, just to try to head off the error at the pass...)
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:George Dyson's continued downplaying of British computing...
by abecedarius on Thursday March 08, 2012 @05:08PM
(#3681913)
Ah, no problem.
I looked up the book on Atanasoff -- it's by Jane Smiley, and I should add that she clearly didn't understand computers (most egregiously, she seemed to think 'digital' meant 'electronic'). Still, not taking her judgments for granted, I thought there was some interesting history there I hadn't heard about, and Atanasoff really seemed to have gotten a lot right earlier than most, and Mauchly to have only subtracted value from what he'd learned from him. (Eckert on the other hand came off as a great engineer.) I have no independent knowledge of this stuff, however.