Re:LLaMA2 isn't “Open Source” – and why it doesn't matter
by nsplayer on Friday July 21, 2023 @01:43PM
(#36816952)
They could have picked up the LLM equivalent from LLM generated posts online however. How do you prove they didn't?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:LLaMA2 isn't “Open Source” – and why it doesn't matter
by denlekke on Friday July 21, 2023 @02:18PM
(#36817431)
as a layman, i imagine for someone at the scale required it may not be worth the risk or the added effort vs paying or using a different model but it'd be funny if we see companies creating a subsidiary that just acts as a web-passthrough to "legalize" llama2 output as training data