Re:The Illusion of AI’s Existential Risk
by eulgro on Wednesday July 19, 2023 @10:26PM
(#36796220)
And so it is said in the book.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
And since the book itself is a work of fiction, it doesn't really tell us what will reality look like.
Yes and no: good science fiction takes a trend and extrapolates. Extrapolation should be based on logic (to be good - but you can also just aim for entertaining and go wild).
The details might differ, but it's worth thinking about whether the implications make sense. Watt's certainly asks a lot of good questions which other orders have also asked - i.e. Accelerando[1] is very interested in the idea of "what happens to mankind when economic systems can no longer be participated in by recognizably human minds?" - taken out to the limits of known physics.
[1] https://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/fiction/acceler...
^^^ You read the full-text here, I highly recommend it.
Re:The Illusion of AI’s Existential Risk
by gpderetta on Thursday July 20, 2023 @06:15AM
(#36798659)
Of course it doesn't, but it is a thought experimented presented as a novel.
Re:The Illusion of AI’s Existential Risk
by ineedasername on Wednesday July 19, 2023 @11:07PM
(#36796472)
Yes, Blindsight is also the book that pointed me towards Metzinger’s Being No One.