News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:GPT-4 is getting worse over time, not better by lolinder on Wednesday July 19, 2023 @12:03PM (#36788615)
Like I said, I read their requirement differently—the phrase they use is "the code only".

I don't think that including backticks is a violation of this requirement. It's still readily parseable and serves as metadata for interpreting the code. In the context of ChatGPT, which typically will provide a full explanation for the code snippet, I think this is a reasonable interpretation of the instruction.

Re:GPT-4 is getting worse over time, not better by lukas099 on Wednesday July 19, 2023 @01:43PM (#36790298)
I understand your point better now. I'm still not sure how I feel about it, because code + metadata is still not "the code only", but it's not a totally unreasonable interpretation of the phrase.