News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Microsoft faces antitrust scrutiny from the EU over Teams... by bob1029 on Wednesday July 19, 2023 @08:55AM (#36785533)
> Some people complain about the bundling, but that can be really convenient for your organization.

If you have <50 employees and you are standing on principle against the completely bundled cable TV vertical that Microsoft is offering, I genuinely question how much you care about the success of your business. We should be able to have a rational, business-oriented review of their value proposition - as of 2023, not 2010 or 2018.

Organizations that have a lot of loose capital and cowboy investors might be more interested in playing in traffic with 20+ vendors and horrible integration stories, but we (aka our <20 employee org) really need to ship solutions to paying customers or we don't have any jobs in 12 months.

I always hear everyone complain about how expensive it is, but I feel like John Travolta meme each time I look at our Azure/Microsoft account. The per-seat & consumption/serverless billing models feel like dust in the wind when you have so few employees. Everyone is doing a lot, so why not put a lot of power under each seat? If you intend to do more with less people, I really feel like Microsoft is the answer. If you are a F100 org, I totally get it. Fuck Microsoft. Use something totally different. Build your own datacenters.

Re:Microsoft faces antitrust scrutiny from the EU over Teams... by itsoktocry on Thursday July 27, 2023 @12:55PM (#36896489)
>I genuinely question how much you care about the success of your business

If you run a <50 person company, and you're bike-shedding about which chat program to use, I seriously question how much you care about your business.