News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Ten Years of “Go: The Good, the Bad, and the Meh. Parent comment

Re:Ten Years of “Go: The Good, the Bad, and the Meh by valenterry on Tuesday July 18, 2023 @03:47PM (#36778191)
It's not about creating a tree map, it's just about using one. Maybe even one provided by a library, doesn't matter. I'm sure that 95% of the developers will need a tree map at least once in their career.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Ten Years of “Go: The Good, the Bad, and the Meh by Veraticus on Tuesday July 18, 2023 @04:03PM (#36778356)
I've been using Golang professionally for about a decade. In that time the only place I've ever needed to use a tree map was an interview that specifically called for it.

Whose usage are you trying to optimize the language for? Golang is not a good academic language. But it is extremely good for actually solving problems with code.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Ten Years of “Go: The Good, the Bad, and the Meh by Mawr on Tuesday July 18, 2023 @05:43PM (#36779492)
A tree map is just an example.

More compelling ones are sets, ordered maps, a generic sync.Map, optionals (nulls suck!), abstractions over channels - badly needed!

I wouldn't consider any of those to be academic.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Ten Years of “Go: The Good, the Bad, and the Meh by kaba0 on Wednesday July 19, 2023 @05:11AM (#36783769)
See the example given from Kubernetes. Is that not a real codebase, or what?
[ Parent | on HN ]