Ten Years of “Go: The Good, the Bad, and the Meh

Re:Ten Years of “Go: The Good, the Bad, and the Meh by mikebenfield on Tuesday July 18, 2023 @01:52PM (#36776610)

> And Go has succeeded despite these condescending diatribes on how a language needs to have a Hindley-Milner type system with ADTs and type classes to be useful

Fine. But it's beside your parent comment's point. The article claims that everyone thought Go's type system was an advance on the state of the art. This isn't even close to true.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Ten Years of “Go: The Good, the Bad, and the Meh by primax on Tuesday July 18, 2023 @05:37PM (#36779422)

Building something that can be successfully adopted and operationalized at mass scale is an element of the state of the art.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Ten Years of “Go: The Good, the Bad, and the Meh by xctr94 on Wednesday July 19, 2023 @05:58AM (#36784068)

Amen. I’ll give Microsoft crap any day, but the most popular language on Earth is now routinely developed with a sane type interpreter that eliminates entire error categories.

[ Parent | on HN ]