News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google+ shares numbers with NYTimes by joejohnson on Tuesday March 06, 2012 @04:01PM (#3672855)
They're counting YouTube and the Android Marketplace as Google Plus-enhanced products? Well, then of course those numbers are high. I'd like to see how much direct traffic Google Plas receives.
Re:Google+ shares numbers with NYTimes by smeg on Tuesday March 06, 2012 @04:14PM (#3672916)
That they would try such deceptive tactics to prop up G+ shows how truly desperate they are.
Re:Google+ shares numbers with NYTimes by tompagenet2 on Tuesday March 06, 2012 @05:58PM (#3673330)
I fear I may be a different kind of chap than Mr. Gundotra, but if my friends were posting on Google+ then I don't think they'd be sharing tips on the best microwave to buy.

I don't really understand why Google+ is so stagnant. I know I'm not attracted to it as no one I'm interested in posts there. I guess this is a classic (lack of) network effect. There's nothing much wrong with the interface, but with no reason for me to visit I can't see it going anywhere.

Most damningly I do not know a single person in the real world who is also on Google+ and has posted more than once. A few have signed up after I nagged them, posted once and then given up, but the majority have not even got that far.

Google need to find a feature that attracts users to Google+ in the first place. So far I can't name that.

Re:Google+ shares numbers with NYTimes by AznHisoka on Tuesday March 06, 2012 @04:58PM (#3673116)
We all know G+ is struggling in traffic. It's no secret. Most moms don't use it. Most teens don't know what it is. Most grandmas haven't even heard of it.