News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Intuitionism by circlefavshape on Friday July 14, 2023 @05:26AM (#36721494)
I've been thinking about this recently, and realised that your framing here casts humans as separate from the rest of reality. Your sense organs and your brain are part of things-in-and-and-of-themselves.
Re:Intuitionism by bowsamic on Friday July 14, 2023 @08:14AM (#36722761)
Yeah, this was the big step from Kant to Hegel, the realisation that the object is actually totally inside the subject and vice versa. Unfortunately, when the subject and object get totally mixed up in that way, the philosophy seems to become much more difficult and complicated. Kant's Transcendental Idealism is really useful and easy to understand, but if you want to go a step further into what you describe then it's like moving from Newtonian gravity to General Relativity. Literally everything becomes way more difficult.
Re:Intuitionism by RubyRidgeRandy on Friday July 14, 2023 @09:42AM (#36723914)
I don't think it does. Humans are agents within reality and have perceptions of reality. Your brain having a representation in this reality that might be different from 'true reality' doesn't change the argument at all.
Re:Intuitionism by circlefavshape on Friday July 14, 2023 @11:17AM (#36725202)
I don't see how your perceptions can be anything other than a direct experience of reality interacting with itself unless you imagine that your mind is separated from reality somehow
Re:Intuitionism by pphysch on Friday July 14, 2023 @11:57AM (#36725814)
We do have a direct experience with reality, but we are only capable of processing an approximate & infinitely simplified model of it.

When you take a picture of an apple, you have a picture of an apple, not the apple itself. Both are real and related, but not the same thing.