News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Congressman demands details of secretive ACTA treaty be m... by jackfoxy on Tuesday March 06, 2012 @11:23AM (#3671654)
Treaties are ratified by the Senate. Not the House. Congress refers to both houses, or sometimes just the House of Representatives, but never to the Senate alone. Anyway Issa is a Congressman, not a Senator.
Re:Congressman demands details of secretive ACTA treaty be m... by gee_totes on Tuesday March 06, 2012 @12:22PM (#3671927)
Important difference to point out. You phrasing tripped me up though, and I want to point out that Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) (who's linked above) is also upset about ACTA not being considered a treaty.

So members of both houses are angry (thus Congress in general), but only the Senate's approval is needed for a treaty. It is unconstitutional for a president to enter into a treaty w/o Senate approval.

Article II, Section 2, Paragraph II of the Constitution states that the President: "shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur"

(Sorry, I've recently gotten into constitutional law and wanted to post this FYI)

Re:Congressman demands details of secretive ACTA treaty be m... by nextparadigms on Tuesday March 06, 2012 @01:19PM (#3672138)
Maybe he had help from Sen. Wyden. I know he was trying to open up ACTA and get it ratified by the Senate.