Re:Age of universe at 26.7B years, nearly twice as old as pr...
by tomp on Thursday July 13, 2023 @04:02PM
(#36715166)
As a mathematician, I don't think about Big Bang as the "start of time" (or any other dimension), but simply as "fixed point" (of the "physical evolution of all particles in the universe" function).
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Age of universe at 26.7B years, nearly twice as old as pr...
by Certhas on Thursday July 13, 2023 @04:07PM
(#36715228)
It's not a fixed point of the equations, though. That is technically incorrect and also not the right intuition. It's the exact opposite. It's a point at which the acceleration of (the density of) all particles diverges, and thus the equations can not be continued past that point.