B.C. government hit tweet limit amid wildfire evacuations

Re:B.C. government hit tweet limit amid wildfire evacuations by coldpie on Thursday July 13, 2023 @01:34PM (#36712953)

I interpreted their comment as saying the specific alerts that user receives are useless to them. I definitely agree with that. If enough people feel as we do and turn the alerts off, then yes, I think the system itself does become useless. I don't know how many people turn them off.

This could be avoided by making the implementation less terrible. I don't know how we arrived at the current situation where they're either deafening, or entirely off. It seems really stupid to me that those are the only options. I would prefer to receive them, but it's not worth waking me up at 3 AM for a flooded road 20 miles away.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:B.C. government hit tweet limit amid wildfire evacuations by ineedasername on Thursday July 13, 2023 @01:50PM (#36713245)

>If enough people feel as we do and turn the alerts off, then yes, I think the system itself does become useless. I don't know how many people turn them off.

That's like saying x = x. Of course if people don't use the system, the system isn't being useful. Contrary to that hypothetical, I am making the observation that people do use the system and often find it useful.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:B.C. government hit tweet limit amid wildfire evacuations by coldpie on Thursday July 13, 2023 @01:55PM (#36713337)

Sure, that's a fair take. My comment was more responding to your comment saying that turning off alerts is a "shit move," by explaining why many of us choose to turn them off.

[ Parent | on HN ]