Re:What we learned from using GPT for 500k+ classifications
by mistymountains on Tuesday July 11, 2023 @07:36PM
(#36688606)
No, you need to show the model is better on this narrow task, not just assert it is because it’s a great general LLM. It’s quite possible you’re correct but just saying GPT is the best, prove me wrong, reeks of a VC or AI bandwagoner.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:What we learned from using GPT for 500k+ classifications
by og_kalu on Tuesday July 11, 2023 @07:52PM
(#36688721)
The OP is about classification. I linked to benchmarks showing it is indeed much better on the kind of task outlined in the OP as well as several other NLP tasks.
I believe "prove me wrong" is more than appropriate here.