C++23: The Next C++ Standard

Re:C++23: The Next C++ Standard by 0xffff2 on Tuesday July 11, 2023 @01:17PM (#36684085)

That's really nothing like python strings, which for the same string would be

    formatted_str = f"My name is {name} and my favorite number is {num}"

The function call I could forgive, but the the ability to embed arbitrary python expressions into the f-string directly is a huge readability win IMO.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:C++23: The Next C++ Standard by interroboink on Tuesday July 11, 2023 @01:41PM (#36684488)

Meanwhile Perl's over here like "we had this in the 90s!" (:

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:C++23: The Next C++ Standard by gpderetta on Tuesday July 11, 2023 @02:42PM (#36685435)

Of course posix shells gad that even before. How far we can go? What's the first language that had something that resembles string interpolation?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:C++23: The Next C++ Standard by interroboink on Tuesday July 11, 2023 @02:55PM (#36685643)

I'm sure someone here can say something about Lisp machines (:

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:C++23: The Next C++ Standard by coldtea on Tuesday July 11, 2023 @07:51PM (#36688708)

Well, if that's the syntax, I'd rather not have it!

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:C++23: The Next C++ Standard by coldtea on Tuesday July 11, 2023 @07:50PM (#36688704)

That type of interpolation is something most non-scripting languages don't have anyway, and it took Python several decades to get it, and only has had it in the 5 years or so.

[ Parent | on HN ]