News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Wayland on OpenBSD by badsectoracula on Monday July 10, 2023 @06:54AM (#36664550)
> Not really. KWin has Wayland specific paths that simply don't work on X

What exactly do you refer to? Note that i meant the kernel APIs to drive the hardware as what i replied to was Xorg not keeping up with newer hardware, not toolkits.

Re:Wayland on OpenBSD by shmerl on Monday July 10, 2023 @11:31AM (#36667889)
I mean stuff like bugs with boot screen leaking data not being fixed with X and so on.
Re:Wayland on OpenBSD by badsectoracula on Tuesday July 11, 2023 @06:07AM (#36678773)
How does that have anything to do with X not keeping up with new hardware or using the same kernel APIs as Wayland for communicating with said hardware?

What you describe is a minor annoyance at most, not at all on the same level as being unable to use X because of newer hardware. Even if it isn't fixed, one can still be worked around or just ignored, but the other just makes the whole thing literally unusable.

Re:Wayland on OpenBSD by shmerl on Tuesday July 11, 2023 @01:23PM (#36684217)
That means that X case will become increasingly broken. It won't work and won't be supported, newer hardware or not.

And X won't have parity for hardware features anyway. Like HDR - it will be Wayland only. And so on and so forth. So X is fried on all ends in the long term.

It's not that it's not possible to use kernel interfaces - it's just no one will bother putting an effort in developing X because it a waste of effort. It's already happening.