Re:Authors say OpenAI 'ingested' their books to train ChatGPT
by wickoff on Monday July 10, 2023 @03:22AM
(#36663077)
I hope this point of view wins eventually. It's the only sensible one.
Re:Authors say OpenAI 'ingested' their books to train ChatGPT
by kijalo on Monday July 10, 2023 @06:18AM
(#36664237)
Presumably you paid for some of the trash you read, either through buying a book outright, borrowing from your library (taxes), etc?
Re:Authors say OpenAI 'ingested' their books to train ChatGPT
by b33j0r on Monday July 10, 2023 @06:39PM
(#36673980)
Hey, if we have to pay a content-agnostic version of spotify $0.000006 cents per token to a vague group of original authors, I’m all for it!
But how are we going to compensate Kurt Cobain, the Beatles, Beethoven, and random sounds I heard from my backyard for my supposedly original works on my soundcloud?
Re:Authors say OpenAI 'ingested' their books to train ChatGPT
by infinitezest on Monday July 10, 2023 @08:45AM
(#36665538)
Snark aside, for this analogy to work you'd have to be able to leverage your "training data" at a much larger scale than a single person typically can. You would also need to be able to train at the same speed. Scale is the key factor here.
I didn’t mean to read your books, they were mostly trash. I’m so sorry for reading things you published!