News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Authors say OpenAI 'ingested' their books to train ChatGPT by b33j0r on Monday July 10, 2023 @02:22AM (#36662773)
Ok. I may as well come clean. For the past 36 years, I have been ingesting all of the information available to train a model called b33-j0r

I didn’t mean to read your books, they were mostly trash. I’m so sorry for reading things you published!

Re:Authors say OpenAI 'ingested' their books to train ChatGPT by wickoff on Monday July 10, 2023 @03:22AM (#36663077)
I hope this point of view wins eventually. It's the only sensible one.
Re:Authors say OpenAI 'ingested' their books to train ChatGPT by kijalo on Monday July 10, 2023 @06:18AM (#36664237)
Presumably you paid for some of the trash you read, either through buying a book outright, borrowing from your library (taxes), etc?
Re:Authors say OpenAI 'ingested' their books to train ChatGPT by b33j0r on Monday July 10, 2023 @06:39PM (#36673980)
Hey, if we have to pay a content-agnostic version of spotify $0.000006 cents per token to a vague group of original authors, I’m all for it!

But how are we going to compensate Kurt Cobain, the Beatles, Beethoven, and random sounds I heard from my backyard for my supposedly original works on my soundcloud?

Re:Authors say OpenAI 'ingested' their books to train ChatGPT by infinitezest on Monday July 10, 2023 @08:45AM (#36665538)
Snark aside, for this analogy to work you'd have to be able to leverage your "training data" at a much larger scale than a single person typically can. You would also need to be able to train at the same speed. Scale is the key factor here.