Re:PDP-10 Incompatible Timesharing System emulator
by TheOtherHobbes on Sunday July 09, 2023 @08:17PM
(#36660497)
It would take unusual dedication, plenty of space, and a huge budget for electricity and air con to run a KL10 at home.
I understand the attraction, because they were very popular with users - partly because TOPS-10 was relatively intuitive and could be learned by almost anyone, and timesharing was very much an experience of personal computing.
That was a huge deal when most computing still had to go through operators and other expert intermediaries.
TOPS-20 was more refined and tried to be even friendlier, with nice features like command completion.
Neither was at all UNIXy - a good thing IMO.
Re:PDP-10 Incompatible Timesharing System emulator
by zabzonk on Sunday July 09, 2023 @08:30PM
(#36660565)
he was prepared to sacrifice his 2-car garage, but i think the three-phase and other electrics defeated him. of couurse, it wouldn't have been switched on anywhere near all the time. and his girlfriend wasn't keen. perhaps a bit too big for a hobby project?
Re:PDP-10 Incompatible Timesharing System emulator
by shrubble on Sunday July 09, 2023 @10:48PM
(#36661474)
If I remember correctly the DEC supplied power supplies were hugely inefficient, and CompuServe redesigned the power supplies since they were using so many of these systems.
Re:PDP-10 Incompatible Timesharing System emulator
by aap_ on Monday July 10, 2023 @12:28AM
(#36662093)
> first release 1970, according to wikipedia.
Under that name. It goes back to the PDP-6 monitor, 1964.
Re:PDP-10 Incompatible Timesharing System emulator
by WalterBright on Monday July 10, 2023 @03:24AM
(#36663087)
I have good memories of playing Star Trek all night on a DECwriter connected to a -10.
first release 1970, according to wikipedia.
> It's fairly hard nowadays to find 36 bits machines still running,
true. one of our system programmers looked at buying our Dec10 but power supply and cooling problems defeated him - it was eventually sold for scrap.