We're telling people to RTFM, but the FM doesn't say a thing about how this is dangerous.
If it was considered standard to avoid use of your brakes at all costs, and accelerate at maximum speed at all times, and this was reflected in the owner's manual - sure, I would think cars were unsafe.
Also not mentioning it isn't the same as avoiding it 'at all costs'.
To continue the analogy: Sales person says "Look how fast this Ferrari can go!", then later, in the manual, "Drive at a responsible speed given your local laws, etc."
All that said I do actually think that changing the default to be more annoying and more safe is a good thing (and it's been done https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/06a3a8a458e70c1b6531ac...). Just saying that I agree with raganwald -- this isn't even close to a 'security vulnerability'.
Saying that `update_attributes` is a security vulnerability doesn't really make sense... it's like if I said cars can accelerate to very unsafe speeds by default and this is a huge safely risk, ignoring the fact that cars also come with brakes :)